Backtracking or Clarity? Blessing CEO Denies Alleged Assault by IVD, Blames Viral Video on Robbery

Introduction: A Viral Video and Immediate Backlash
Controversial Nigerian relationship expert Blessing CEO (real name Blessing Okoro) is currently navigating intense scrutiny after a disturbing video she posted went viral, leading many to believe she had been assaulted by her fiancé, known as IVD. The viral clip, which Blessing CEO quickly deleted, showed scenes of distress and included her cry for “urgent help,” along with remarks about IVD’s mental state.

However, speaking amid a fierce social media backlash, the self-proclaimed relationship guru has issued a strong denial. She claims the video was completely taken out of context and had nothing to do with domestic violence at the hands of IVD.

The Denial: Clarifying the Disturbing Footage
Blessing CEO’s initial post sparked immediate criticism, largely due to her prior, outspoken defense of IVD against allegations that he was responsible for the death of his late wife through domestic abuse. Critics accused Blessing CEO of finally experiencing the same issues she had previously dismissed.

In response to the viral assumptions, Blessing CEO offered a different explanation for the disturbing footage: She asserted that the video was recorded during a robbery incident, not a domestic dispute.

During her clarification, she forcefully pushed back against the narrative being established online:

“You all should bring proof that I was beaten by IVD. IVD is someone’s brother, he is someone’s son. Why do you want me to lie that he beat me? Why do you people want to force me to accept domestic violence that doesn’t exist?”

This defiant statement forms the core of the Blessing CEO Denies IVD Assault Claim, challenging netizens to verify their claims instead of forcing a narrative of abuse onto her relationship.

The Context of Controversy: IVD’s History
The immediate public assumption of domestic violence stems directly from IVD’s controversial history. The businessman has been subject to heavy public and legal scrutiny following the death of his wife, leading to widespread accusations of domestic violence and abuse within their marriage.

Blessing CEO has been one of IVD’s most vocal and ardent public defenders, which made her distress call particularly jarring to the public. Her attempt to clarify that the distress was caused by a robbery, rather than IVD, serves as a reaffirmation of her belief in her fiancé’s innocence regarding the alleged assault.

Conclusion: Blessing CEO Denies IVD Assault Claim
The situation surrounding Blessing CEO, IVD, and the viral video remains highly sensitive and divisive. While she vehemently denies any assault by her fiancé, the incident highlights the difficulty public figures face in controlling narratives, particularly when their personal relationships intersect with prior public controversies.

The central takeaway is the clear denial that Blessing CEO Denies IVD Assault Claim, insisting that the public’s eagerness to find evidence of domestic violence led to a dangerous misinterpretation of a separate crime—a robbery.

Do you think the public should have waited for a full statement before making assumptions about the video, or was the context of the situation fair ground for suspicion?